Privacy Policy

Science Park publisher policy

Science Park Publisher is a multidisciplinary research area of science, technology, medical, providing open-access publishing with free charges to avoid the restrictions of others. Science park publisher is guided by the policies that are carried out by Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Therefore, the authors should carefully and accurately introduce their results, content, and conclusion to help other researchers and develop ideas for advanced science and technology.  

Affiliation

The authors should mention their affiliations to clarify the institution and academic position of the researcher. The affiliation approves and supports the location of scholarly work of the published research. If you moved to another institution through the publication process, you should mention the workplace of the published article and note your current affiliation.

Authorship

All persons who contributed to the scientific research should be listed as authors and mention their affiliation, if there are other individual contributors, you could mention them in the acknowledgment and write their roles and responsibilities to complete the article. Crediting the significant author who worked in the research is one of the most important processes of writing the article and reflects the honesty and transparency of coworkers in data analysis, editing, experimental work, designing, interpretation, comparative study, and other relative areas. They are responsible of reviewing and editing the final version before submission and answering any major or minor comments with solutions after the review stage until the proof stage.

The corresponding author is the only one of the authors who is responsible to submit the manuscript files to Science Park Publisher, so editors of Science Park Publisher are accountable for contacting authors and sending Emails to them. The corresponding author should ensure that the accepted article has been approved by all co-authors. 

Authors should revise the order of names and accept the list, also if the corresponding author asked the editorial board to add or remove any author or rearrangement in the author list the coauthor should send permission and agreement letter of all changes before acceptance.   Moreover, the person who is being added or removed should send an agreement of changes to the submitted article. 

Citations

All persons who contributed to the scientific research should be listed as authors and mention their affiliation, if there are other individual contributors, you could mention them in the acknowledgment and write their roles and responsibilities to complete the article. Crediting the significant author who worked in the research is one of the most important processes of writing the article and reflects the honesty and transparency of coworkers in data analysis, editing, experimental work, designing, interpretation, comparative study, and other relative areas. They are responsible of reviewing and editing the final version before submission and answering any major or minor comments with solutions after the review stage until the proof stage.

The corresponding author is the only one of the authors who is responsible to submit the manuscript files to Science Park Publisher, so editors of Science Park Publisher are accountable for contacting authors and sending Emails to them. The corresponding author should ensure that the accepted article has been approved by all co-authors. 

Authors should revise the order of names and accept the list, also if the corresponding author asked the editorial board to add or remove any author or rearrangement in the author list the coauthor should send permission and agreement letter of all changes before acceptance. Moreover, the person who is being added or removed should send an agreement of changes to the submitted article.

Complaints

Science Park publisher allows the author to appeal the decision of journal editors and complaint to the editorial management of the peer review operation. 

Science Park Publisher welcomes your opinion of the editor’s decision and introduces good evidence and response to the comments of the editor and peer reviewers.

Competing and Conflict of Interest

Authors of the published article could inform Science Park Publisher to retract or correct the article in restricted conditions. Science Park Publisher would accept the corrections or retraction if the authors introduce clear and strong evidence that could affect the trueness of the research data or experimental error. If Science Park Publisher editors discovered that the contents have previously been published without permission or have a proper attribution, they will retract the article. Science Park Publisher will accept the urgent corrections according to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Science Park Publisher will retract the unethical research or plagiarism.

Misconduct

Science Park Publisher will carefully take misconduct forms and will follow the COPE guidelines. The forms of misconduct are citation manipulation, third-party content without proper distribution, duplicate submission, data fabrication, plagiarism, unethical research, and affiliation misrepresentation.

Plagiarism

Plagiarism is defined as when authors introduce the work of others like data, images, tables, text, or theories as they are the owners of the work, while self-plagiarism is defined as taking the work of the same author and republishing it as a new work in different journals. Plagiarism or self-plagiarism is not acceptable and unethical work. Authors should cite the original work and acknowledge the other work that influences their publication or as a review article. Science Park Publisher opposes the practice of plagiarism and duplicate publications, and it is a stolen work, so the action that will be taken is to reject or remove it from Science Park Publisher.

Science Park Publisher will carefully take misconduct forms and will follow the COPE guidelines. The forms of misconduct are citation manipulation, third-party content without proper distribution, duplicate submission, data fabrication, plagiarism, unethical research, and affiliation misrepresentation.

Funding sources

If the work was carried out with received funds from any institution or company, authors should mention the funding within the publication.

Data availability and open access

Science Park is offering high-quality open-access research as possible to reach all over the world as articles, reviews, reports, or books. Authors will have the final version of their publication on an open access rule with immediate and high accuracy following the Creative Commons attribution CCBY license.  

Third-party material

If the manuscript contains data, material, tables, figures, schemes, audio, video, screenshots, or any other content that is not owned by the authors and not created by them, they must obtain written permission from a third party and follow the copyright rules.

Research involving humans and animals

If the study of the research contains human participants and identity or photos of patients as in medical research, authors must mention a statement that the study is approved by the national research ethics committee with the ethical standards. If the patients are underage or unable to provide any personal information, authors must introduce permission from their parents or guardians.

If the study involves experimental works on animals, authors must have an approved statement from the relevant institutional ethics committee, or the institutional animal use and care committee including the name of the institution, and follow the national or international guidelines in their research procedures.

Peer Review for Journals

Science Park Publisher journals provide you with the ability to publish your research with high quality, so the submission process of the submitted research will be passed by several steps of the review process. If our journals discovered that the research has been published in other journals, the submission process will be canceled. If the scope of the research is not related to the scope of the selected journal, the editorial board will reject it and ask you to transfer it to another suitable journal. Science Park Publisher is responsible for selecting a professional editorial board and expert in related fields of international journals. They should be a professor title or higher would be preferable. All editorial members must be from different nationalities and publish a lot of papers and have a high H-index that will be given priority.  Editors should treat all authors with transparency and no conflict of interest. Ensure the confidentiality and impartiality of each author.  Editor in chief of the journal is responsible for the final decision of acceptance or rejection of the manuscript based on the report of the reviewers.  The editors and reviewers treat the submitted articles as confidential files through the reviewing process. 

The manuscript will be reviewed by three reviewers or more as suggested by the editorial board. Moreover, Editors have the right to invite new additional reviewers if the manuscript needs that and Editors will inform the authors of the further review decision.

The reviewers should hold a Ph.D. or MD in medical journals. Expert in the submission field and have publications proved from Scopus and ORCID. They must have no conflict of interest with any author and should not have published with an author in the last two years. Reviewers who accept to review must provide quality reports with ethics standards and professionalism.