Author Guidelines
The Journal of Literary Insights and English Linguistics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing scholarly articles in literature, linguistics, translation, and interdisciplinary language studies. All submissions must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration elsewhere. The journal follows the latest edition of the APA (American Psychological Association
https://apastyle.apa.org/) style for referencing and citations in linguistics and translation, and the latest edition of MLA (Modern Language Association
https://style.mla.org/) style for literature and literary studies.
This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This policy is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.
1. Publication Ethics
Authors must ensure that their research complies with relevant ethical standards and regulations and that all necessary ethical approvals have been obtained where applicable.
Authors should also ensure that their manuscripts are original, properly acknowledge the work of others, and comply with the journal's policies on authorship, plagiarism, duplicate publication, and conflicts of interest.
2. Types of Submissions
a. Research Article (6,000–8,000 words)
These are full-length, original research papers that offer substantial contributions to scholarship. Articles must demonstrate critical engagement with current debates and clearly articulate the research question, theoretical framework, and analytical methods.
Research Articles should normally include:
- Abstract (max. 250 words)
- Keywords (3–6)
- Introduction (problem statement, objectives)
- Literature Review and/or Theoretical Framework
- Methodology/ Approach, where applicable
- Analysis/ Findings
- Discussion
- Conclusion (including implications and/or directions for future research)
- References
- Appendices, where applicable
Research Articles undergo single-blind peer review and must adhere strictly to the APA or MLA referencing style.
b. Review Articles (4,000–6,000 words)
Review Articles provide a critical and analytical synthesis of significant scholarship, emerging developments, theories, approaches or debates in fields relevant to the journal. They must go beyond summarizing existing works to offer new insights, comparisons, or critiques.
Review articles should:
- Identify trends or gaps in current scholarship
- Demonstrate critical engagement with at least 10–15 key sources
- Be structured thematically or analytically (not chronologically)
This format is especially suited for scholars seeking to shape the field’s discourse or position new theoretical frameworks.
3. Submission Requirements
3.1 Competing Interests and Conflict of Interest
The corresponding author, on behalf of all authors, must disclose any financial or personal relationships with individuals or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias their work. Potential conflicts of interest include, but are not limited to, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, grants or other financial support.
All authors, including those with no conflicts of interest to declare, should provide this information to the corresponding author, who will collect and submit it. If applicable, the corresponding author should use the designated tool to create a shared statement, which should be uploaded using the "
Attach Files" link during the file-submission step.
This statement should be placed in a separate section titled "Declaration of Competing Interest" at the end of the manuscript, just before the References section.
3.2 Declarations
Manuscripts should also include the following declarations:
- Funding: Provide details of any financial support received for the research, including grants, fellowships, or other funding sources.
- Data Availability: Explain the transparency and accessibility of the data used in the research. Include details on where the data can be accessed or any restrictions to access.
- Code Availability: Indicate the availability of any software applications or custom code used in the study. Provide links or information on how the code can be accessed if applicable.
- Ethics Approval: Ethical approval for research involving human or animal subjects is typically obtained from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or an Ethics Committee affiliated with the author's institution or organization. This approval ensures that the study adheres to ethical standards and guidelines, such as the Declaration of Helsinki for human research. In the manuscript, authors should explicitly state where and from whom ethical approval was obtained. For example, they might include a statement such as:
"Ethical approval for this study was granted by the [Name of Institution/Organization] Ethics Committee (approval number [XXX]) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki."
If the study was exempt from requiring ethical approval, this should also be clearly stated, along with the reason for the exemption. For example:
"This study was reviewed by the [Name of Institution/Organization] Ethics Committee and granted an exemption from formal ethical approval because [reason for exemption]."
Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed. In all cases, authors must ensure transparency and compliance with ethical standards, providing readers with confidence in the integrity of the research process.
- Use of Tools/Services: If specific tools or services were used during the preparation of the manuscript (such as statistical software or text editing services), include a statement like:
"During the preparation of this work, the author(s) used [NAME TOOL/SERVICE] in order to [REASON]. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the publication."
The declaration does not apply to the use of non-generative tools such as standard grammar checkers, spelling correctors, or reference management software.
• Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Scientific Writing: Authors should disclose in their manuscript the use of AI and AI-assisted technologies by following the instructions below.
1- Where authors use generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process, these technologies should only be used to improve readability and language of the manuscript. Their use should be done with human oversight and control, and authors should carefully review and edit the result, as AI can generate authoritative-sounding output that can be incorrect, incomplete or biased. AI and AI-assisted technologies should not be listed as an author or co-author or be cited as an author. Authorship implies responsibilities and tasks that can only be attributed to and performed by humans.
2- Where authors use generative AI and AI-assisted technologies as part of the research process for purposes other than improving readability and language (e.g., investigating, comparing, evaluating the output of AI systems), authors must clearly mention this in the manuscript, specifying the AI tool used, the purpose for which it was used, and all the methodological details necessary to ensure reproducibility.
Authors must disclose the use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process by adding a statement at the end of their manuscript in the core manuscript file before the References list. The statement should be placed in a new section entitled ‘Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the Writing Process’.
Statement: During the preparation of this work, the author (s) used [NAME TOOL/ SERVICE] in order to [REASON]. After using this tool/service, the author (s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the publication.
3.3 Verification for Submission
By submitting an article, you affirm that the work has not been previously published (except in the form of an abstract, lecture, thesis, or preprint), is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere, has been approved by all authors, and has received either explicit or implicit approval from the relevant authorities where the research was conducted. If accepted, the article will not appear elsewhere in the same format, in English or any other language, including in electronic form, without the written permission of the copyright holder.
JLIEL accepts articles that have been previously posted as preprints, provided that they undergo significant revisions and improvements. These articles will be subject to a thorough peer review process to ensure they meet the publication standards before being officially published.
To confirm compliance, your article will undergo checks using Crossref Similarity Check and other tools designed to detect originality or duplication.
3.4 Reporting on Sex and Gender in Research
For research involving humans, authors should consider sex and gender as relevant variables where applicable and use the terms "sex" and "gender" accurately and consistently. "Sex" refers to the biological traits associated with physical and physiological characteristics in humans and animals, while "gender" pertains to the socially constructed roles, behaviors, and identities of women, men, and gender-diverse individuals, influenced by historical and cultural contexts that differ across societies and change over time. For additional guidance, authors may consult the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines.
3.5 Using Inclusive Language in Research
Inclusive language in scientific research ensures respect for diversity, sensitivity to differences, and equal opportunities for all. It is important to avoid assumptions about readers’ beliefs or values and to refrain from language that implies superiority based on factors such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, disability, or health status. Research writing should be free from bias, stereotypes, and cultural assumptions. Where possible, authors should use gender-neutral language.
3.6 Authorship
Authorship Criteria
Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made substantial contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the research. This includes those who have participated in drafting or critically revising the manuscript. It is important to establish clear authorship criteria early in the research process and ensure that all co-authors agree on their inclusion.
Acknowledging Contributions
Individuals who contributed to the research but do not meet the authorship criteria should be recognized in the acknowledgments section. For transparency, authors are required to provide an author contribution statement file detailing each contributor’s specific role using the relevant CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) classifications, which include 14 roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - Original Draft, and Writing - Review & Editing. Authorship statements should list each author’s name followed by their corresponding CRediT role(s). Note that not all roles may apply to every manuscript, and authors may have contributed through multiple roles.
Order of Authors
The order of authors should reflect the relative contributions of everyone to the research. This sequence should be agreed upon by all co-authors before submission. The corresponding author must be clearly designated.
Changes to Authorship
Authors should carefully review the authorship list and order before submitting their manuscript and provide the final approved list at the time of the original submission. Any changes to authorship, including additions, removals, or rearrangements, must be formally requested before acceptance and must be approved by the journal editor.
To request a change in authorship, the corresponding author must submit:
1. A clear justification for the change.
2. Written confirmation from all co-authors, including consent from any author being added or removed.
Changes to authorship after acceptance will only be considered in exceptional circumstances. During the review of such a request, publication will be put on hold. If the manuscript has already been published, approved changes will be reflected in a corrigendum.
If you want to add a co-author, please send an email request to the journal office. A form will be sent to you, which must be completed and returned for the editor’s consideration.
3.7 Role of Funding Source
Authors are asked to specify the organization(s) that funded the research and/or the preparation of the article, and to briefly describe their role, if any, in the study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation, as well as in writing the report and deciding to submit the article for publication. If the funding source(s) had no involvement, it is recommended that this be mentioned.
3.8 Referees
Please submit the names and institutional email addresses of several potential referees. Please provide a list of at least three referees. Avoid recommending individuals who are your colleagues or who have collaborated or co-authored with you within the past three years. Editors will not consider reviewers with potential conflicts of interest. To ensure a comprehensive and unbiased evaluation of your work, as well as scientific accuracy, please propose a diverse group of reviewers from different countries or regions than your author group. Additionally, consider diversity in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, career stage, and other factors. Do not suggest members of the journal’s editorial team, as they are already known to the journal.
The editor has the discretion to decide whether or not to invite the reviewers you have suggested.
3.9 Manuscript Submission
Submission Process
Our online submission platform will take you through each step of the process, allowing you to input your article details and upload your files. Editable formats such as Word are required. All communication, including decisions from the Editor and revision requests, will be sent via email.
The author must inform the Editor of manuscripts submitted, soon to be submitted, or in press at other journals that have a bearing on the manuscript being submitted. Duplicate submission is not permitted and will result in rejection. Ethical guidelines issued by
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) are followed.
File Format & Submission
- Submit via Science Park Publisher website.
- Acceptable formats: Microsoft Word (doc/docx).
Include the following files:
- Title Page (unblinded; with author(s) full details)
- Main Manuscript (blinded; excluding author-identifying information)
- Highlights: 3–5 bullet points (≤85 characters each) summarizing your paper’s main findings, novel contributions, and methods in clear, nontechnical language to boost discoverability. Avoid jargon, acronyms, and duplication from the abstract.
Title Page
Include the following:
- Full article title
- Full names of all authors with institutional affiliations
- ORCID iDs (optional but encouraged)
- Email address of corresponding author
- Short biographical note (50–70 words per author)
- Funding acknowledgment
Manuscript Structure & Formatting
a. General Formatting
- Font: Times New Roman, 12 pt
- Line spacing: Double
- Margins: 1 inch on all sides
- Page numbers: Top right on all pages
- Use only three heading levels (e.g., Level 1 bold, Level 2 italics)
- Paragraphs: Indent first line; do not add extra space between paragraphs.
- Do not use footnotes for citations; use sparingly for clarification only
b. Manuscript Sections (in order)
- Title Page (submitted separately, unblinded)
- Abstract (max. 250 words)
- 3–6 Keywords
- Main Text (Introduction, Literature Review/Theoretical Framework, Methodology/Approach, Analysis/Findings, Discussion, Conclusion, as appropriate)
- Acknowledgments
- Funding
- Conflict of Interest
- Declaration of AI and AI-Assisted Technologies (if applicable)
- Author Contributions (CRediT Taxonomy)
- References
- Appendices (if applicable)
Figures, Tables & Linguistic Examples
a. Figures
- Insert in text where they should appear
- Label sequentially (Figure 1, Figure 2, etc.)
- Provide captions below each figure
- Format: PNG, JPEG, or TIFF (min. 300 dpi)
b. Tables
- Insert in text with clear numbering (Table 1, Table 2…)
- Caption placed above each table
- Use Word’s table function—not tabs
c. Linguistic Data
- Use Leipzig Glossing Rules where applicable
- Present glossed examples in numbered format or tables
- Maintain consistency in transcription and font (e.g., use IPA where needed)
4. Peer Review Process
- The journal operates a single blind peer review system.
- Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two subject experts.
- The typical peer-review period is 3-4 weeks.
- Upon revision, authors must submit a point-by-point response to reviewers’ comments.
The Editor is responsible for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles. Editors are not involved in decisions about papers that they have written themselves or that have been written by family members or colleagues, or which relate to products or services in which the Editor has an interest.
5. After Acceptance
To ensure a fast publication process of the article, we kindly ask authors to provide their proof corrections within two days. Corresponding authors will receive an email with a link to our proofing system, allowing them to annotate and correct the proofs. The environment is similar to MS Word: in addition to editing text, you can also comment on figures/tables and answer questions from the Copy Editor.
All instructions for proofing will be given in the email we send to authors
We will do everything possible to get your article published quickly and accurately. Please use this proof only for checking the typesetting, editing, completeness, and correctness of the text, tables, and figures. Significant changes to the article as accepted for publication will only be considered at this stage with permission from the Editor. It is important to ensure that all corrections are sent back to us in one communication. Please check carefully before replying, as the inclusion of any subsequent corrections cannot be guaranteed. Proofreading is solely your responsibility.
6. Copyright & Open Access
- Authors retain copyright
- All articles are published open access
- A DOI will be assigned to each accepted article
